mouse monoclonal antibody at180 (Thermo Fisher)
Structured Review

Mouse Monoclonal Antibody At180, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody+at180/at180+antibody/pmc12141574-170-0-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies"
Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies
Journal: Scientific Reports
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04291-y
Figure Legend Snippet: Immunohistochemical labelling of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described in the “Materials and methods”. (a) Staining of AD and control frontal cortex tissue using monoclonal antibodies 7F2, AT180, 1F10, and AT100 is shown. Thin arrows indicate NFTs, arrow heads demonstrate neuritic plaques, thick arrows highlight neuropil threads. Scale bar of low magnification images is 100 μm, inset is 15 μm. (b) Semi-quantitative analysis of AD tau pathology in the frontal cortex is described in the “Materials and methods”. Data is presented as mean +/- SEM.
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Control, Bioprocessing
Figure Legend Snippet: Immunohistochemical labelling of PSP and CBD neuropathology. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described in the “Materials and methods”. (a) Staining of PSP and CBD striatal tissue using monoclonal antibodies 7F2, AT180, and 1F10 is shown. Scale bar is 80 μm. (b) Semi-quantitative analysis of PSP and CBD tau pathology in the caudate and putamen is described in the “Materials and methods”. Data is presented as mean +/- SEM.
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Bioprocessing
Figure Legend Snippet: Immunohistochemical labelling of PiD neuropathology. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described in the “Materials and methods”. Staining of PiD hippocampal tissue using antibodies 7F2, AT180, and 1F10 is shown. Scale bar of low magnification images is 100 μm, inset is 15 μm.
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining
Related Articles
Immunohistochemical staining:Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies Article Snippet: AT180 is a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tau phosphorylated at Staining:Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies Article Snippet: AT180 is a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tau phosphorylated at Control:Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies Article Snippet: AT180 is a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tau phosphorylated at Bioprocessing:Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies Article Snippet: AT180 is a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tau phosphorylated at Blocking Assay:Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies Article Snippet: AT180 is a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tau phosphorylated at Avidin-Biotin Assay:Article Title: A novel pThr217 tau monoclonal antibody reveals neuropathological heterogeneity in tauopathies Article Snippet: AT180 is a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for tau phosphorylated at |
![Progressive Tau pathology in the hippocampus of THY-Tau22 mice. (A–D) Distinct antibodies were used to detect total human Tau (HT7), misfolded Tau (MC1), PHFs and phospho-Tau (AT8 and <t>AT180)</t> at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age in hippocampi of THY-Tau22 mice. Exemplary images are shown for 3 (left) and 9 months (middle). Quantification of immunoreactivity over time (right): immunoreactivity for each antibody was measured in three layers of the CA1 region (stratum oriens = O; stratum pyramidale = P; and stratum radiatum = R), by placing rectangles into each area and measuring mean fluorescence intensities (MFI), as shown for HT7 staining at 3 months [ (A) , left]. Staining intensity in the CA1 layers was quantified relative to staining intensity of wild type controls (set as 100%). For the first time point (3 months of age), significant differences are indicated relative to wild type controls. For subsequent time points (6, 9, and 12 months of age) differences in immunoreactivity in THY-Tau22 sections were calculated relative to the proceeding time point to asses age-dependent differences in each of the layers analyzed. (A) At 3 months HT7 + immunoreactivity was present in all subfields (CA1, CA3, and DG) of the hippocampus (left). At 9 months signal intensity increased in all subfields (middle), leading to a significant increase in the mean pixel intensities for all subfields over time (right). (B) At 3 months misfolded Tau species (MC1 + ) were mainly detected in the polymorph layer (po) of the DG, the stratum lucidum (sl) and the distal stratum pyramidale (P) of CA1 (left). At 9 months the number of MC1 + cells located in CA1 region was increased (middle), resulting in increased MFIs in O and P (right). (C) At 3 months only weak AT8 + immunoreactivity was detectable, with few scattered positive cells in the CA1 region (left). At 9 months AT8 + immunoreactivity was detectable in dentate granule cells and was dramatically increased in CA1 pyramidal cells (middle), resulting in increased MFIs in O and P (right). (D) At 3 months of age, AT180 + immunoreactivity was prominent in all hippocampal subfields (left) and was even more enhanced at later time-points (9 months, middle). Quantification indicated a progressive increase from 3 to 12 months of age in all layers (right). (E) Microglia (IBA1) were present in a regularly distributed pattern all over the hippocampus with no obvious changes in morphology or distribution over time (left and middle), despite a slight increase in MFI at 12 months compared to 6 months of age (right). Note that no analysis was performed for IBA and GFAP at 9 months of age. (F) With exception for the stratum pyramidale and stratum granulosum (sg), also astroglia (GFAP) were regularly distributed over the whole hippocampus. From 3 to 6 months of age there was a significant increase in GFAP immunoreactivity. Data are depicted as mean ± SEM. MFIs in sublayers were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001. All images were captured with the same laser intensity, avoiding overexposure. N = 3–5 animals per genotype and age, n = 6–15 analyzed areas; images depict maximum intensity projections taken from 40 μm coronal sections, scale bars: 500 μm.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_9437/pmc09909437/pmc09909437__fncel-17-1106176-g001.jpg)
